Blog & Media

Writing, research, and commentary.

Analysis of the AI fiscal transition, the framework's constitutional design, and the politics of adoption. Subscribe for updates.

AllBlogOp-EdMediaResearch
Blog
BlogApril 2026
Why the AI Productivity Levy is not a robot tax
Robot taxes penalise capital. The AI Productivity Levy prices commons inputs. The distinction is the difference between a non-distortionary land value tax and a distortionary property tax — and it determines whether the mechanism survives first contact with corporate lobbying.
Read more →
Op-Ed
Op-EdApril 2026
An open letter to the next finance minister who inherits a structural deficit
Every finance minister in every advanced economy will, within the next decade, confront a budget in which AI has permanently reduced income tax revenue. The question is whether they inherit a tool to model the transition or discover it in a crisis.
Read more →
Blog
BlogMarch 2026
Five things the Blueprint is not
Not a world government. Not a cryptocurrency project. Not a universal basic income scheme. Not a UN treaty proposal. Not a prediction. What it is: a constitutional architecture for the fiscal transition that AI is about to force.
Read more →
Research
ResearchMarch 2026
The 2080 problem: why every economy reaches terminal debt
The Antithesis Model's central finding — all 49 modelled economies reach terminal debt-to-GDP by 2080 — is not a forecast. It is the compound arithmetic of holding existing tax structures constant while AI displaces the labour they depend on.
Read more →
Blog
BlogFebruary 2026
What sovereign AI actually means (and why most governments are getting it wrong)
Sovereign AI is not an AI model trained on local data. It is a policy intelligence environment that operates entirely within a jurisdiction's own infrastructure, with zero data extraction. The distinction matters because the alternative is permanent digital dependency.
Read more →
Blog
BlogFebruary 2026
Constitutional design for people who think constitutions are boring
The trade book distils 26 Books of constitutional architecture into a narrative that starts with the question every voter already asks: why do angry people keep electing dangerous leaders? The answer is structural, not psychological.
Read more →